Jennifer Edwards and her ... well, wits? or Oh my Goddess, not one of those again!

This is the article in question, if they still have it circulating by the time you read this post ... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-edwards/dance-art-income-wages_b_1568875.html
....
Interestingly enough a very similar argumentation that Jennifer Edwards writes in the Huffington Post has been used in the time of an appointed minister of culture in the Netherlands, who publicly boasted about his illiteracy in the arts, then cut back an already small portion of the Dutch financial governmental budget (always less than 1%, even in the 'golden' years of the 1970s) enough to effectively cripple an entire industry, called government-sponsored art, and within that, an even tinier portion reserved for government-sponsored dance. Actually that's not quite true, he didn't mention the call for kinesthetic intellectuals. This was not in the 1930s, but 2012, the culmination of an entire decade of continued devaluation of non-traditional and experimental dance-culture in the Dutch mainstream-media, who succeeded in giving contemporary dance an image only good German critics of the comparable decade above did a better defaming-job with, but unfortunately to very similar results ...


To actually reply to Edwards' argumentation:

In my perspective she is, shall I say it the Japanese way ... a little late with her call for kinesthetic intellectuals, and definitely 20 years late with her call for artistic entrepreneurs.

I seriously ask myself where has she been living all this time: The call for artists to be (more serious) enterpreneurs, (and, in a more veiled way, oh, while we're at it, perhaps please a little less annoying and weird at that, shall we?) is what people have been hurling at dance-professionals for the last five decades ...

And if you want kinestethetic intellectuals: ever at least since the work and legacy of Anna Halprin, Merce Cunningham, Elaine Summers, Judson Dance Theatre, and many others in their wake (Pauline de Groot, Mary O'Donnell, Mary Overlie) dance has been a kinesthetic, sensorial, intellectual enterprize to the max. And this is just within a single cultural zone: On the other side of the Atlantic, it may suffice to name such almost-forgotten capacities as Elsa Gindler. And so on, all over the globe (Germaine d'Acogny, Suprapto, Tatsumi Hijikata, the list is ongoing and here, so far, my education falls short and I have more homework to do - further suggestions are welcome ...)


Elaine Summers is actually an excellent example for such a kinesthetic genius who realized early on the need for dancers and dance professionals to earn a salary, and has been one those who set up and managed a not-for-profit dance company for 30 years, but also recognized the needs of administration, book-keeping and the like. She combined and at age 80+, still combines, arts development, innovation, and business. Check her out, if you like ...

Kinesthetic workers? I'm all for it. Consider asking the droves of dance-therapists who got kicked out in masses when under the influence of Big Pharma, Psychiatry decided that it would be cheaper and therefore better to put people who couldn't cope with the social standard, called 'normality' on pills, to tranquilize them and maybe even keep them 'happy'. When put against the witch-hunt against Wilhelm Reich who dared help people in their physical liberation beyond what was understood at the time, and whose legacy of love, work, and knowledge, is still waiting for fulfillment, the picture gets very austere indeed ...

To respond to her question, very easily and directly: Yes Mz. Edwards, it is very possible to be an entrepreneur and business-person in this field - if there are those who actually will pay for such research, and do not mind the consequent body-empowerment of a population, that - as a result of kinesthetically intelligent dance - will become more able to deal with their physical selves, counter-acting a good millennium or so, of merciless oppression, spiritual propaganda against, and ongoing eradication of body-knowledge, first with the local European, Mediterranean & North African, and then ah, ... overseas.

As I wrote above, in the Netherlands, anno 2012, the very same rhethoric has been used to cripple what was a small, but not entirely starving industry, always continued under the banner of being renewing, innovative, head-on, etc. To give you an even better idea of what had happened: the entire budget for dance in the Netherlands in 2010 was enough to produce ONE single kilometer of autobahn in the Netherlands, ... ONE, you do the math ... and ask yourself, what can be the true motives of someone who loudly calls for reducing an industry called over-grown, but doesn't mind spending billions of tax-euros on bailing out the national banks, to quote the most simple example. Our colleagues from the Science wing have known for years that free research, when it cannot be used on weapons, or industry, is meager.

All of this eerily made and makes me think of a quote from The Handmaid's Tale by Canadian writer Margaret Atwood -  "Our biggest mistake was teaching them to read. We won't do that again".  In this dystopia, Christian fundamentalists gun down the U.S.-American government, and install a new theocracy in which women not only are not allowed to have property, or have a 'job', but also are barred from reading and writing - (please do NOT bother with the movie by Volker Schlöndorf which essentially fails to get beyond sweaty, albeit forbidden sex and makes patiiarchally acceptable entertainment out of feminist-informed writing ...)

And if you think I am joking, or a bit on the far side, (yes I am emotional in my writing, but that must not distract from what I am presenting for evaluation) - consider reading Sally Banes' excellent article "Power & the Dancing Body", published in this anthology

thanks for reading this far down :-)Good be with us all -